Nikon and Canon comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2c11/c2c11d1cb1cca4402b72fc6b9c6adca7e1ecc01f" alt=""
But they’re both made of plastic.
Yeah, but they have a different feel to them. The Nikon has a sort of pattern on it that makes it feel like leather. The Canon’s surface is smooth and feels cheaper, if you understand what I mean.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05114/0511451531efc64e728c6d7ff7485916a1d913ed" alt=""
So you’re saying the Nikon is better finished?
In the same way that some car makers spend more time on engineering the details.
Can a camera feel like a car?
Think of the Nikon as like a BMW. It costs more, it feels right.
But the cost.
Ah, yes. The cost.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40726/40726ee0372c2aafb47631a37d0416e5b5cae24e" alt=""
And is there a massive difference?
That's up to the user.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home